Yes, that’s right: one of the characters from Detroit is called Chevy. Another is called “Baseball,” because—well, I don’t know. It’s American? Or he’d watched The Wire and noticed that one of the characters was called Bubbles and thought maybe it was something similar? It’s not important, because Mark Millar is telling you how bad things are in the city, y’all. Like, he’s literally telling you, with characters offering laughably heavy exposition that not only doesn’t read like anything any real person would ever say, but of course makes the characters sound like every other character Mark Millar has written regardless of culture, location or any other factor that could possibly differentiate them.

Cheap Superhero Adventures In Other People’s Misery: Mark Millar’s MPH | Wait, What?

@graemem reviews Millar’s MPH. Go read the whole thing.

(via bigredrobot)

Dylan manages to link to my MPH review before I do, because I suck and he doesn’t.

The main way it’s different from This American Life is that instead of bringing you a different theme each week, every episode of Serial will bring you back not just to the same theme but to the same story, to bring you the next chapter. We’re starting with a crime story, that’ll run for about a dozen episodes. Our hope is that it’ll play like a great HBO or Netflix series, where you get caught up with the characters and the thing unfolds week after week, but with a true story, and no pictures. Like House of Cards, but you can enjoy it while you’re driving.

Today’s Distraction: Age and the Modern TV Network Drama | The World That’s Coming

Today’s Distraction: Age and the Modern TV Network Drama | The World That’s Coming

I actually don’t remember the day I started this blog—it was June or July somethingth 2004- so I’ve arbitrarily decided today will henceforth be The Beat’s anniversary. Ten long years of late nights, sleeping five hours, web crashes, Vietnamese Instant Coffee, Amon Tobin, Luke Vibert, Vitalic, Tipsy, Mahler, Stravinsky and Amy Winehouse. Ten years of stopping whatever else I was doing at some point to say “I gotta do The Beat now.” Ten years of watching the graphic novel industry grow, 10 years of a new golden age of comics, the rise and fall of manga, the rise and rise of comic book movies and TV shows, firings, hirings, 10 days that shook the world. Ten years of the internet changing every week or minute. When I began there was no Tumblr, no Twitter, no Facebook, no Youtube, no smart phones. People were so starved for entertainment that they actually read websites run by one person in their pajamas.

Today’s Distraction: Age and the Modern TV Network Drama

Prompted by these tweets of the redoubtable (Always Toxic) Laura Hudson’s, and the conversation that followed–really, the fact that deadlines meant that I had to drop out of said conversation–I found myself looking into whether or not TV dramas were skewed towards female leads under 30. The answer, as they say, may surprise you. Or, at least, it surprised me.

I took all the U.S. network dramas from the fall 2014 season–purely because it was closer to hand–and looked up the ages of the female leads in each show. There’re some guesses as to who the female lead will be in some shows–I chose Jada Pinkett Smith for Gotham because her signing was the biggest news, but I’m uncertain whether she’s going to stay on the show past a year, for example–but my guide was generally “which female actor has the biggest role and/or serves as audience POV?” (Hence my choice of Jennifer Morrison for Once Upon a Time, for example). Also, shows that specifically center around the female lead (As opposed to, say, “He’s the hero, she’s the love interest” or whatever) are in bold; in cases where it’s an ensemble or two-hander where the female lead(s) have equal weight to male stars, it’s in italic.

Anyway, the results are below:

ABC
Castle (Female lead: 36)
Agents of SHIELD (Female lead: 50)
Forever (Female lead: 38)
Nashville (Female lead: 47)
Grey’s Anatomy (Female lead: 44)
Scandal (Female lead: 37)
How to Get Away with Murder (Female lead: 48)
Once Upon A Time (Female lead: 35)
Resurrection (Female lead: 62)
Revenge (Female lead: 28)

CBS
NCIS: Los Angeles (Female lead: 30)
NCIS: New Orleans (Female lead: 40)
Person of Interest (Female lead: 43)
Criminal Minds (Female lead: 35)
Stalker (Female lead: 35)
Elementary (Female lead: 45)
Hawaii Five-O (Female lead: 40)
Blue Bloods (Female lead: 44)
Madam Secretary (Female lead: 48)
The Good Wife (Female lead: 48)
CSI: Cyber (Female lead: 46)

FOX
Gotham (Female lead: 42, if it’s Jada Pinkett Smith, which–it probably)
Sleepy Hollow (Female lead: 29)
Red Band Society (Female lead: 44)
Bones (Female lead: 37)
Gracepoint (Female lead: 45)

NBC
The Blacklist (Female lead: 31)
State of Affairs (Female lead: 35)
Chicago Fire (Female lead: 32)
The Mysteries of Laura (Female lead: 45)
Law & Order: SVU (Female lead: 50)
Chicago PD (Female lead: 31)
Parenthood (Female lead: 47)
Constantine (Female lead: 27)

What surprised me about the outcome was that I genuinely thought there would be more leads 35 and under — instead, we have 19 (maybe 18, depending on Gotham) shows out of 34 where the female lead is over 40. Of course, now I have to do it for male leads and cable shows, but seriously: deadlines are calling loudly enough already.

Edited to add: I completely forgot the CW, but let’s be honest: They’re all 12 on there anyway.

Truth Goggles is by no means the only annotation tool out there. There is Scrible, MarkUp.io (which says it will be relaunching), and a plethora of tools to help web designers, educators and others markup websites with notes and feedback. There’s also efforts like Hypothes.is, which aims to create a fact-based annotation layer for the web. Earlier this month, it received a grant of just over $750,000 from the Andrew W. Mellon Foundation to “investigate the use of annotation in humanities and social science scholarship over a two year period.”

Schultz said his project is different in that it enables content creators like journalists to embed their own annotations on their work for all to see, and because it’s oriented to creating public annotations that are “about getting people to ask better questions and be more critical.”

During a January week in 2012, around 700,000 English-speaking Facebook users were chosen, without their knowledge or consent, to be emotional lab rats. The researchers found that if you tweak what people see in their Facebook news feed – the scrolling information on your page –to suppress or heighten certain emotive words, readers’ emotions will shift to match.

It’s not only emotions Facebook can nudge. It can make you vote, too. On the US presidential election day in 2010 it offered one group a graphic with a link to find nearby polling stations, along with a button that would let you announce that you’d voted, and the profile photos of six “friends” who had already done so. Users shown that page were 0.39% more likely to vote than those in the control group who hadn’t seen the link, button or photos.

The researchers reckoned they’d mobilised 60,000 voters and that the ripple effect caused 340,000 extra votes.

lunch break thoughts: working for free

lunch break thoughts: working for free

Yahoo’s decision to keep the show running now is the television business equivalent of trying to start a new political party by focusing on an issue with a tiny, but passionate constituency. Maybe the Yahoo “Community” will be great. But however wonderful it is, that success does not mean that Yahoo can produce good original television of its own, or that network television will take that success as a sign that it ought to find better ways of nurturing either high-concept television or kind comedy.

Treating the television industry like politics is an appealing idea, but a limited one. Networks can afford to have narrower brands, and in the present television environment, they actually have to — the days of big-tent broadcast are dead. You cannot turn Yahoo, Hulu, or Netflix into the tea party and hope the Big Four get the message.

Alyssa Rosenberg articulates a lot of my feelings about Yahoo resurrecting Community for a sixth season online (I loved the show, but to be honest, I suspect it’d run its course, and a lot of the “WE WON” about the show’s return makes me uneasy, much as it did when Arrested Development came back on Netflix).