Rock and Roll Will Never Die

Life during Primal Scream’s druggiest period must have been a constant stream of surprises. When I tell them that it’s hard to imagine a rock’n’roll band sitting down to write certain songs on More Light (the sprawling River of Pain’s impromptu orchestral crescendo being a good example), they look unsure as to what I mean, so I illustrate the example by saying that it’s easier, for example, to picture them writing a Stonesy guitar number like 1994’s Rocks.

“Rocks?” splutters Innes. “I didn’t even know we’d written it!”

At first I assume he’s joking but it turns out he’s deadly serious.

“[Alan] McGee phoned us up going: “You’ve got a great song,” and I thought: what the fuck are you talking about?”

“I can definitely remember recording it,” adds Gillespie, as if this deserves some kind of prize.

From here.

Oh, Primal Scream. Never change.

(I am very much looking forward to the new album.)

Good News, Bad News

Pleasant surprise of the day: Finding out that, due to the latest reboot of io9, you can actually access my posts in a way other than Googling them individually again.

Unpleasant surprise of the day: Finding this out because, while researching a piece for something, it turns out I’d already written it years ago. I really have no new ideas, it turns out.

Still.

Hello From The Day Job

Secrets behind the Real World! etc.: I wrote a story for Digital Trends that, in the end, I couldn’t actually use today. So I thought I’d let you see it here, instead. Enjoy…?

Exercise isn’t just good for the body, a new study suggests; it also helps mental agility in later life. Which means, yes, now you have two reasons to feel guilty about failing to make it to the gym today.

The study comes from a team led by Dr. Alex Dregan from King’s College London in which more than 9,000 participants were tracked for decades to see the effects of regular amounts of exercise on the human body. Those taking part in the study were regularly interviewed to monitor both their levels of exercise and physical activity, but also their mental agility in terms of learning capability, attention and focus and strength of memory. According to the results, those who had been exercising more than two or three times a month since age 11 ended up scoring higher in mental tests at the age of 50 than those who had not.

(Sadly, the study – the findings of which were released Tuesday in the journal Psychological Medicine – didn’t contain information about the mental health benefits for those of us who gave up on exercise for their twenties because PE was just that traumatic, but eventually returned to it because, well, aging.)

According to Dregan, the results underscore the necessity for people to increase their amount of physical activity. “As exercise represents a key component of lifestyle interventions to prevent cognitive decline, cardiovascular disease, diabetes and cancer,” he said, “public health interventions to promote lifelong exercise have the potential to reduce the personal and social burden associated with these conditions in late adult years.”

The problem, he suggests, may be that exercise is often presented as an all-or-nothing option when that doesn’t have to be the case in reality. “Not everyone is willing or able to take part in the recommended 150 minutes of physical activity per week,” he said, referring to the British government guideline amount of exercise for adults aged 19 through 64 years of age (Yes, there is really one government-suggested amount of exercise for a forty-five year span of time. It’s probably best not to dwell on that, however). “For these people any level of physical activity may benefit their cognitive well-being in the long-term and this is something that needs to be explored further. Setting lower exercise targets at the beginning and gradually increasing their frequency and intensity could be a more effective method for improving levels of exercise within the wider population.”

If you find yourself more concerned with the long-term mental benefits of exercise than the immediate physical gain, then Dr. Dregan believes that the kinds of exercise you enjoy may impact the levels of future clarity of thought; judging from information in the study group, it appears that intense levels of exercise and activity resulted in stronger mental agility in increased age compared with those who had enjoyed more moderate exercise while younger.

Let’s Begin Again

Horse Racing - 2013 Cheltenham Festival - Preview Day - Cheltenham RacecourseFrom the Guardian’s Photo Blog:

Horses from Willie Mullins’ stable at Cheltenham racecourse. The 2013 Cheltenham Festival starts on Tuesday. Photograph: Tim Ireland/PA

And so we return and begin again. Last weekend ended with an incredible, overwhelming sickness that slid into the weekend, leaving today feel like both a fresh start and a desperate attempt to catch up. This foreboding beautiful image seems an appropriate one, in that sense.

Because At Least One of You Demanded It!

Because I asked for questions and the wonderful Chad Nevett responded!

Ever a fan of Babylon 5? If not, why not? If so, ever read any of THOSE novels? (Peter David wrote a pretty great trilogy…)

I’ve never even seen one episode. If I remember correctly, it’s because it was on at a strange time in the U.K. – Maybe Sunday lunchtimes on Channel 4, but I might be misremembering? – and then, by the time it was a “thing,” it seemed almost impenetrable, all years-long mythology and the kind of tight, labyrinthine continuity that I find really off-putting when considering trying out new sci-fi or similar stuff. Weirdly, I now find myself wondering whether I could read the David novels without having seen the show…

Why didn’t they ever make Star Trek: New Frontier into a TV series? Or adapt novels for movies? Pride? Ego? Idiocy? EXPLAIN IT TO ME, GRAEME!

Boring answer: Because Bad Robot controls all things Trek these days, and doesn’t want any competing product for the movies. Plus, Enterprise killed the franchise stone dead for years, let’s be honest… Although Voyager had kind of done a lot of that work already, hadn’t it? I’m not sure New Frontier would’ve really worked in any medium other than prose, for some reason – Certainly, when it’s had comic incarnations, it’s never quite gelled.

How much time do you spending reading books in a day? You seem to go through them at an insane rate — in addition to watching things and reading other stuff like comics and online writing…

It varies? I tend to try to get at least an hour’s prose reading a day, but that doesn’t always work out. I also read very quickly, and if I’m into something, I’ll just sit there and read it until it’s done. I read Mike Skinner’s The Story of The Streets in what was essentially a couple of sittings this past weekend, for example (It’s not as good as you want it to be, and that’s assuming you know who the Streets are/is to begin with, but it’s very readable despite the horrible formatting).

Looking at the past few posts you did about books you read, you seem to be mostly a non-fiction reader aside from genre stuff. Any interest in ‘literary’ fiction? Any Joyce or Dostoevsky on the horizon?

God, no. I am actually a terrible literary fiction reader; I tend to get bogged down in it, overthinking it and feeling restless as if I’m not understanding it properly or getting the most out of it. My last attempt at Joyce was particularly frustrating, but ultimately abandoned because it wasn’t any fun whatsoever and that’s why I read, if that makes sense.
…Actually, the more I think about it, that’s only really true about classic literary fiction. Contemporary literary fiction, I tend to have an easier time with, but also tend to keep back unless (a) I find something that I have to read or (b) I’m on vacation. There’s something about non-fiction that I find much easier to digest and unpick and enjoy – Although, right now, I am struggling through The End of Men in a way that I normally only struggle through fiction – and genre fiction is very intentionally there for me to switch my brain off and drift before sleep.

What do you think about Chuck Klosterman’s writing?

I find that I like the idea of it more than the reality. Or, maybe, that I like it in short bursts, but get irritated by it long form. It’s possibly some kind of self-loathing thing, because the things that annoy me about his writing – His digressions, his vanity, his spontaneity – are things that I find myself wishing I could do better in my writing. Perhaps I’m not that comfortable with him because I want to be him…?
Internet: You too can be like Chad and send me questions that I’ll reply to post-work one day when my brain is a rapidly unwinding mess! Just send questions to gamcm[at]outlook[dot]com and, well, I’ll try to get to it sometime.