So I said, great, let’s look through the last five together. And not all of them were in the public domain. So, I said, “How do you think about the use of these images?”

“Photographers are welcome to file a complaint with Twitter, as long as they provide proof. Twitter contacts me and I’d be happy to remove it,” he said. “I’m sure the majority of photographers would be glad to have their work seen by the massives.”

I pressed him on this point. Shouldn’t the onus be on him and Cameron to get those rights from the photographers they assume would be grateful?

“It would not be practical,” he said. “The majority of the photographers are deceased. Or hard to find who took the images.”

Thought #1: Paying/crediting people who create your content? Pshaw! Playing by the rules generally doesn’t result in people having stories written about them in the Atlantic, especially not stories about them being disruptive influences to the traditional business model.

Thought #2: I should be neither surprised nor saddened by the idea that New Buzz Thing Online Doesn’t Care About Content Creators, given the history of the Internet, and yet, somehow I am.

Thought #3: Seeing this kind of behavior be not only accepted, I guess, but rewarded by the wider Internet at large – oh, people may complain about this, but I doubt that History in Pictures will really suffer in any way because of it – is this very demoralizing thing, a reminder that the Internet not only demands NEW CONTENT continually, but continually disregards and devalues said content in the process. Works of quality are less important than quantity of work.

Zimmerman’s work is a more extreme version of the new, upside-down dynamic of web publishing. Instead of the publisher’s megaphone guaranteeing its articles an audience, the publisher only has an audience insofar as the articles “go viral.” Tens of thousands of readers see most of the dozen items Zimmerman posts each day, but millions see his blockbusters.

For those hits, the content and the clickbait headline are as important as the timing. He describes “going viral” like surfing: boarding a wave at the earliest possible point. “You don’t want to wait too long because you’ll miss that initial cresting,” he says. “It’s a race against everyone else.”

From this fascinating piece on Internet viral material, and why audio never goes viral online. Go read.

On working for the other side

On working for the other side

On working for the other side

english2english:

image

– Erin McCann

The Guardian is a great place to work, full of people who are good at their jobs and make coming to work each day a joy. I love my job.

That said, there are certain … peculiarities … that an American only encounters when all her bosses are British – and the same is true for Brits who find themselves working for Americans. This whole English 2 English project exists because cross-cultural communication can be amusingly difficult. But what’s funny and cute in an interpersonal relationship is a whole other level of complicated tension when you apply it to your work life. 

Therefore, I offer three tips for Americans with British bosses. But what I really want is to hear from you: how do you navigate the minefield when you find yourself employed by the other side?

Read More

I look forward to the “If you’re British and working for Americans” response to this. “For one thing, there’s a bunch of holidays throughout the year that have special names, but you’ll end up working through most of them.”

From the beginning, we’ve been very clear that we are not journalists and we are not a journalistic operation. I see how it might be confusing, because our content can overlap with journalistic endeavors and/or have the same look and feel as journalism. Oftentimes, the news focuses on what’s new over what’s important. Upworthy is the opposite: We will always feature issues and content that we feel are the most important, even if they’ve been ongoing issues… But we are an editorial operation—you can think of our curators as editors, and we’re completely dedicated to fantastic storytelling.

Sara Critchfield, editorial director of Upworthy, explains the aim of the site – and you’ll be AMAZED by what happens next, etc. etc. Surprised to find out that there’s a bunch of former Onion workers over there, but the more I think about it, the more it makes sense.