Is there a universally beloved comic book creator, or a specific series or run that’s similarly legendary, which you’re just totally not into at all? Just to show you I’m not out to get you in trouble, here’s mine: Gil Kane. I respect that he’s a giant in the field, and that Green Lantern costume is gorgeous, but I’ve always found his faces and perspectives unappealing.

bigredrobot:

My long-standing, one-sided feud with Neail Gaiman and his twee-goth masterpiece Sandman, are well-documented, so I won’t go into it here, but Sandman is, basically, the Radiohead of comics.

Also, anything Geoff Johns has ever done. I just don’t relate to it in any fashion whatsoever. It might have something to do with having not read a non-Frank Miller-written DC comic until I was well into my 20s, or it might be just that I’m too big of a snob, but I do not get the guy’s appeal in the least. Same with the other “Weird Jeff,” Jeph Loeb. I mean, people swear by Long Halloween and (ugh) Hush, but you literally could not pay me to read either of those.

I think Garth Ennis is overrated. I mean, bless you if you like his stuff, but I tried and … nope. It’s not for me. Hitman is okay, I guess, but I read the first two trades and didn’t feel any sort of burning desire to see the thing through to the end.

I’m also not really on the “white cartoonist bemoans his life” train, ie. indie sacred cows Chris Ware and Dan Clowes. Their styles are fantastic, but it’s in service of some dull bullshit that doesn’t interest me in the least. Same with Seth, though Wimbledon Green is some A++ stuff. (I haven’t read the sequel, The Great Northern Brotherhood of Canadian Cartoonists, but it’s on my Wish List.)

Come to think of it, Kevin Huizenga’s really the only cartoonist doing that sort of thing that is at all interesting. And he’s not really doing autobio stuff so much as magical realist, quasi-autobio stories. Anders Nielsen’s in the same boat, I guess, but some of his stuff is a little too up its own ass.

This just in: Dylan hates everything. I approve.

Finally, the promise of a truly commercial-free social network is probably never going to happen. (To be fair, this isn’t what Ello is promising; they’ve simply published a “manifesto” saying they will never show you advertising or promoted posts.) There’s two reasons for this.

One, barring extremely vigilant moderation, every social network will see users twisting it towards commercial ends. (MetaFilter and, to a lesser degree, Reddit have been successful at keeping this type of activity to a minimum, but even they offer up advertising and have users clandestinely working behind the scenes to help brands sell.)

Two, social networks eventually have to pay for themselves. So far, no major social networking site has found a way to make people pay for the privilege of talking to their friends. Which, inevitably, leaves advertising. Ello may want to be pure as the driven snow, but engineers and servers don’t come cheap, and social networks can’t simply putter along with a few thousand (or even a few hundred thousand) users and be useful. If Ello is successful and grows, the site’s initial promise—that it will not be a place to sell but a “a place to connect, create and celebrate life"—will give way to economic reality. After that, it’s either endless rounds of VC funding, a quiet shuttering, or advertising and promoted posts.

What’s good, Graeme? What’re you happy with/about or excited for lately?

2014’s been a weird year, so part of me is just happy with being on an even keel at this point, to be honest. (That sounds really depressing, but it’s not meant to be.) But it’s the fall, which I love – I’m very happy when the days get colder and the trees turn new colors before they fall apart. Fall also means I start baking more, and the experimentation with sugars and chocolate and oats to make the ideal cookies is exciting in a truly nerdy way (75% dark brown sugar, 25% pure cane sugar, leave the dough in the fridge overnight – makes the cookies chewier).

What else? Looking for Moondog albums on vinyl. WGN’s Manhattan, which isn’t exactly “happy,” but is very good. The prospect that a new issue of Ganges might be on the horizon. Falling back in love with the Mirah album from earlier this year. Stuffs like that, I guess – and spending more time with Kate, the dogs, and friends.

Oh! Something that’s made me excited and happy recently, that’s been odd but wonderful: there was a week recently where I found myself looking after a few dogs in the neighborhood during the day because their owners were otherwise engaged. It wasn’t a big deal, but meant that every day at lunch, I’d go and visit these three dogs who’d be so ridiculously happy to see me, and we’d hang out. That was pretty great.

(Seriously, baking, listening to good music and hanging out with dogs while it’s autumnal and dark outside: That’s pretty much my definition of an ideal day. Just add in some good reading and I’m all set.)

With all of their recent announcements like the Hickman/Ribic Secret Wars, Wolverines, the cinematic Civil War and Age of Ultron vs. Marvel Zombies has Marvel: a)jumped the shark, b)lost their collective minds, c)somehow just trolling us all or d)some combination of the above?

I’m kind of impressed by the way that the interesting – to me, at least – announcements from Marvel at NYCC (Kathryn Immonen and Rich Ellis doing a Peggy Carter series! Getting Nicole Perlman to do comics!) have been overshadowed if not entirely drowned out by the “bigger” announcements, which seem almost comically regressive and conservative. The latter things are what’s going to make them all their money, of course, but I do wish that they’d announced less at the show to give some of the other announcements some room to breathe.

Which is to say, it’s probably a combination of a) and c), but we both know that so many people are going to buy Secret Wars and all its related projects that Marvel definitely hasn’t lost its mind.

Wolverines is still an absolutely nutzo idea, though.

A Republican Missouri lawmaker said that she meant “no ill intent” toward President Obama when she asked on her Facebook page if the U.S. military was able to oust the president.

In a Facebook post last week, Jefferson County Recorder of Deeds Debbie Dunnegan referred to Obama as “our domestic enemy,” according to a screenshot published by Progress Missouri.

“I have a question for all my friends who have served or are currently serving in our military … having not put on a uniform nor taken any type military oath, there has to be something that I am just not aware of. But I cannot and do not understand why no action is being taken against our domestic enemy. I know he is supposedly the commander in chief, but the constitution gives you the authority,” she wrote in the post. “What am I missing? Thank you for your bravery and may God keep you safe.”

Dunnegan, who is up for re-election in November, said that her question was taken out of context, according to the St. Louis Post-Dispatch.

What do you think about Twin Peaks coming back?

I’m… cautiously excited? I enjoyed the show a bunch when it was on, but there’s a lot about the idea of Frost and Lynch returning 25 years later that makes me very nervous, not least of which is the fact that it’s 25 years later. I’m already bracing myself for the televisual version of “Free As A Bird,” to be honest.

Random Thought About Podcasting

Earlier today, I wondered how viable it would be to curate a daily podcast feed about culture that, every morning, would release a short episode by different people touching on a particular news story/anniversary/event. Like, one day, it’s rachelandmiles talking about rumors about the new X-Men movie, the next it’s dynamofire about some music that I’ve never heard of because I’m old, and so on and so on.

The answer is, of course, “not viable at all,” because I’d want those people to be paid for what they did and ha ha ha I’m not a media mogul. And yet, there’s something about the idea that sticks with me and, I suspect, will continue to do so for awhile.

When Stan Lee did the first Spider-Man book, it was like he was talking directly to the reader and saying, “You may find Spider-Man a little bit corny, but stick with it.” I was kind of into that whole idea of the comic book talking to the reader and establishing this relationship, and then weaponizing that relationship and making it quite dark and fucked up. Multiversity is kind of about that, the ideas that we allow into our heads. We protect our money behind safes, we protect our security behind the Pentagon, behind giant walls. But we allow any kind of idea through our skulls into these private spaces. I wanted to write about that—why do we allow such intimate invasion?

Grant Morrison, talking about the origins of The Multiversity in an interview with James Gunn.