Draw Naked

Draw Naked

“Sexy Lucy”

lucybellwood:

“So, I have a challenge for you.”

I’m sitting on the couch scarfing pomegranate seeds and ice cream while my gentleman friend looks up from doing the crossword.

“I’d love to see you draw Sexy Lucy. I mean, if you want to. If you think it would be fun.”

I laugh through a mouthful of dessert. “What? Why?”

“Well, I saw you draw Happy Lucy today and that was really adorable, and I’ve seen Grumpy Lucy and Goofy Lucy and Tired Lucy, but you never seem to draw Sexy Lucy.”

Now, my gentleman friend is a smart cookie. He is perceptive and thoughtful and often gets me thinking about things I’ve become comfortable accepting at face value. I like him for this and many other reasons.

“That’s not…” I frown, trying to word my response properly.

He raises his hands “I mean, I get it. Cartoon Lucy is boats and comics and illustration, right?”

“Yeah but that’s not the whole of it. Cartoon Lucy is mostly cute and euphoric and goofy. She’s kind of a muppet. These are not characteristics that are divorced from who I actually am. They’re very accurate portrayals ofparts of me. But there’s also stuff I leave out. Stuff a lot of autobio cartoonists leave out.”

We go on to talk about it for a little while, but even after the conversation moves on to something else this question sticks with me. Why is it that all the autobio cartoonists I know (even the immensely sex-positive ones who spend the rest of their time drawing porn or sex toy reviews or even stories about making out with their younger selvesseem to avoid drawing themselvesas sex symbols? When we talk about sex or sexuality it’s either playful or sweet or educational or analytical or mortifying or just downright goofy, but rarely…sexy.

Read More

So very worth reading, and one of those moments when you read something and go that person’s a friend of mine and I am not worthy. Or, at least, you do if you’re me.

I’m kind of confused as to why Steve was angry at Tony in Avengers #34 and now he’s apparently on good terms with Tony as of Captain America #25 and Axis #1, which take place later on. Will this be explained eventually?

brevoortformspring:

People seem to be very confused about the overall chronology, so I thought I should maybe lay some stuff out here, because there is one gaffe within it all that seems to be causing a lot of the problems. And that gaffe is Thor’s hammer.

So yes, going back, RAGNAROK NOW/AVENGE THE EARTH happens in UNCANNY AVENGERS. Thereafter. some time later, ORIGINAL SIN happens, during which Steve Rogers regains his knowledge of the Illuminati and what they’ve been doing.

The bit that people seem to be having difficulty with is the fact that Steve doesn’t act on this information immediately. But he does not—he doesn’t make a move until some point within the eight month period we’re now in, leading up to the TIME RUNS OUT issues of AVENGERS/NEW AVENGERS.

Part of that is that he’s dealing with other problems, primarily the loss of his youth and vigor, which happens in CAPTAIN AMERICA. This is where the Thor problem comes in, as because we were working on all of this stuff so far ahead of time, Thor appears in the immediate follow-up storyline in CAP, THE TOMORROW SOLDIER, with his hammer.

Given that Thor doesn’t do anything particularly important with his hammer in that storyline, just assume that that’s a “chronicler’s error”, and that he was actually wielding his axe, Jarnbjorn.

This all takes us into AXIS, where not only has Sam Wilson succeeded Steve as Captain America, but Wolverine has also died, in DEATH OF WOLVERINE. And Thor is again carrying Jarnbjorn.

And at some point over the next few months, we’ll get to the point where things begin to lay out as we see them in AVENGERS #35 and NEW AVENGERS #24 and thereafter. But we’re not quite there yet.

Also, as I mentioned earlier today, Thor having both arms in AXIS #1 isn’t a mistake. You’ll have to keep reading both AXIS and THOR to see what I mean—or you can not, and either simply take my word for it, or decide that I’m crazy and not buy any of it. Totally up to you. But Thor having both arms was an important bit of coordination between the AXIS crew and the THOR crew.

Simple enough, yes?

(And here come the questions…)

Comics, everybody!